On Mon, 2011-12-05 at 11:32 -0800, Josh Stone wrote: > On 11/28/2011 12:47 PM, Chuck Ebbert wrote: > > On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 10:06:32 -0800 > > Josh Stone <jistone@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> On 11/22/2011 09:51 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > >>> -#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE < KERNEL_VERSION(3, 1, 0) > >> > >> It may have be helpful for the faked 2.6.4x kernels to still present a > >> 3ish LINUX_VERSION_CODE. AFAIK, faking the number is for the benefit of > >> userspace, not any kernel module. Perhaps it's not too late? > > > > I've done this in the 2.6.41.3 update. Please try it. > > Sorry I didn't try sooner, as I don't actually have any pressing need > for the change myself. But I happened to have the e1000e-1.6.3 source > handy, which failed in kcompat.h on 2.6.41.1-1, but does compile > successfully with 2.6.41.4-1. So, looks good to me! Hi, Now I'm co-maintaining VirtualBox on rpmfusion you got on my external link VB 4.1.4 for F15 http://www.serjux.com/virtualbox/ if you try it let me know , in meantime I will read the begging of the thread, I also have some doubts about the kernels 41. But the main problem is, can't submit it on F15 because kBuild is not updated (on F15) and I'm waiting for a decision on fesco about this matter (update kBuild). Regards, -- Sérgio M. B. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
