On 25 November 2011 23:31, Rex Dieter <rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > These? app-install (and friends) still pending review it seems, > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488962 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488968 > If the objections truly have been dropped, I'd be happy to help move this > along. I got burned by the whole process. I got zero help from anyone in the fedora infrastructure team, and was asked to change the format of the data twice, and was asked to make the generation tools use less RAM, then less CPU, then told that there was not enough disk IO to generate the rawhide daily metadata. I'm still happy to generate the appstream-compatible data and write a trivial UI for this (or to fork and port ubuntu-app-install) but Fedora infrastructure either needs to want to host this on the servers and do the work integrating it into the compose tools, or it needs to accept that we ship a package full of cached data like I've been suggesting all along, and like Ubuntu have been doing for over 5 years. Actually doing the work is pretty easy, but I've not got the energy to fight for the application data in Fedora anymore. Richard. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
