On Tuesday 07 September 2004 14:16, Paul Nasrat wrote: > I'm not sure that's ideal behaviour - it is possible to use things such as > --dbpath and --root (ignoring not being able to move the transaction lock > for the moment). I wouldn't expect a failed (EPERM) rm command to suggest > rerunning as root, likewise for rpm. > > Also theoretically we could have a "package_installer_r" with selinux to > enable certain rpm install operations. This would still require root permission. SELinux doesn't give additional rights. -- http://LinuxWiki.org/RonnyBuchmann
