Giovanni Campagna wrote: > We also need translations (that are in .desktop files > but not in .spec files), Looky here, a spec file with translations: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=mine_detector.git;a=blob;f=mine_detector.spec;h=294bcf4148789afb1ba7bb7b11971e231e001061;hb=master Making lots of translators co-maintainers of all packages just to let them translate the spec files wouldn't scale of course, but there also exist translated package descriptions which do not originate from the spec files – even for packages without desktop files. At least some Swedish translations exist; I don't know about Italian. I can't tell you exactly how those translations are produced and distributed, but someone who works with translations presumably could. > we need screenshots, we need reviews, we need > ratings. OK, then I'm starting to understand what you want. You might want to find a better term for that than "application installer", as it apparently does a lot more than just install applications. How much new server infrastructure do you think would be needed? Is a hierarchy of FTP mirrors with a round-trip time of a day or two satisfactory for distributing reviews and ratings? Björn Persson
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
