On 11/20/2011 05:37 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 08:05:34 -0600, > Bruno Wolff III<bruno@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> It looks like there was a soname bump in boost yesterday. Boost affects >> enough stuff, that there really should have been a heads up message posted to >> the devel list about this. > > It looks like there may have been a semantic change in how BOOST_FOREACH > is used. The upstream docs for it don't seem to have changed, but wesnoth > isn't rebuilding today. gcc hasn't changed since the last successful > build of Wesnoth, so it is likely to be due to the boost change. There's also problem when building Qt apps with boost-1.48 due this bug: https://bugreports.qt.nokia.com/browse/QTBUG-22829 . Regards, Jan Kaluza -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
