Re: Rethinking proventester and critpath

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ken Dreyer (ktdreyer@xxxxxxxxxxxx) said: 
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 6:06 AM, Nils Philippsen <nils@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hm. The list of (implicitly labeled) critpath packages seems to have
> > proliferated recently
> 
> Why not impose a self-restriction on the number of critpath packages?
> Make a rule like "The ratio of proventesters to critpath packages must
> be x or higher". When the critpath numbers start creeping up, drop a
> few other packages from critpath. This will help focus testing
> efforts, and allow it to expand along with the growth of the
> community.

This then implies creation of a process that involves continual review of
the critpath package list, where it was designed to be able to be simply
computed without a lot of manual work.

Bill
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux