Re: Fedora clean up process seems to be seriously broken...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" <johannbg@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2011 12:57:24 PM
> Subject: Re: Fedora clean up process seems to be seriously broken...
> 
> On 11/22/2011 09:40 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > On 11/22/2011 04:51 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> >> On 11/21/2011 10:50 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> >>> I understand this thread as a comment on improving the detection
> >>> of
> >>> inactive maintainers and unmaintained packages.
> >> It is indeed intended as such.
> > I would recommend you stop this thread at this point and write up a
> > concrete proposal and submit it to FESCo and/or help with scripts
> > that
> > automate the detection of potentially unmaintained packages.  I
> > would
> > also recommend that you become a package maintainer so that you are
> > aware of the other side and understand the problem areas better.
> 
> First of all why do I need to come up with a concrete proposal to
> FESCO
> why dont they come up with something to try to improve the
> distribution.
> 
You don't improve distribution, when you start bullying contributors. Bunch
of people were already annoyed with your proposal. 

> Does that governing body only exist to say yay or nay to others
> proposals?
> 
Imho FESCo should mainly decide about technical difficulties. All of us
already have our own projects, so why should I care about this one?
Anyone on list can get your idea and work on heuristics if (s)he believes
it helps and than propose some actions.

> Secondly the only reason I don't maintain packages within the
> distribution is because I'm fully aware that I dont have time in
> doing so.
> 
> So instead of me working under the illusion that I can resulting in
> me
> half ass maintaining stuff at best I rather choose not, to cause I
> know
> for a fact that nobody gains anything from it infact I would just be
> signing up to become the part of the problem not the solution if I
> did.
> 
> And I'm already fully aware of the other side given that I receive
> every
> bug filed at systemd and I also can tell you that of each of ca 8 of
> 10
> bugs filed there the reporter should be filing against relevant
> component containing their unit files as opposed to systemd itself. (
> Apparently if anything fails at bootup it's systemd's fault )
> 
> I am giving what I can when I can, to contribute the distribution and
> my
> actions there speak well enough for themselves and will continue to
> do so.
> 
> My first and foremost priority is to get the migration process over
> with.....
> 
> JBG

Marcela
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux