On Sunday, November 20, 2011 10:26:09 AM Steve Grubb wrote: > On Sunday, November 20, 2011 10:20:51 AM Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Steve Grubb <sgrubb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > I was curious how many library packages we have that also includes > > > applications in them, so I wrote a small shell script: > > > > > > http://people.redhat.com/sgrubb/security/lib-bin-check > > > > That just checks for a path. It doesn't check if the "application" is > > just a shell script, which is noarch. New script posted. This dropped the list by about half. > > > On my F16 installation, it finds around 60 packages that are libraries > > > with applications. I'd like to ask if anyone else sees this as a > > > problem? For example, if a 32 bit library is installed, which > > > application is left - the 64 or 32 bit one? And wouldn't that also pull > > > in unnecessary dependencies? > > > > Again, not if it's noarch. The list of packages you found with > > problems would have been nice. libreport-gtk-2.0.6.x86_64 libgnome-2.32.1.x86_64 libtar-1.2.11.x86_64 libreport-newt-2.0.6.x86_64 libgpg-error-1.10.x86_64 libEMF-1.0.4.x86_64 libnotify-0.7.4.x86_64 libselinux-2.1.6.x86_64 libiptcdata-1.0.4.x86_64 libsamplerate-0.1.8.x86_64 libkgeomap-2.3.0.x86_64 libgnomekbd-3.2.0.x86_64 libmsn-4.2.x86_64 libmx-1.4.0.x86_64 libreport-2.0.6.x86_64 libxslt-1.1.26.x86_64 libvirt-0.9.6.x86_64 libcanberra-0.28.x86_64 libtunepimp-0.5.3.x86_64 libidn-1.22.x86_64 libcanberra-gtk3-0.28.x86_64 libgnome-media-profiles-3.0.0.x86_64 libhangul-0.0.12.x86_64 libcroco-0.6.2.x86_64 libkactivities-6.1.x86_64 libieee1284-0.2.11.x86_64 libgpod-0.8.2.x86_64 libwnck3-3.2.1.x86_64 But this is just my system and not an everything install. -Steve -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
