Re: gdbm license change

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/14/2011 08:59 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 20:46 +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote:
>> On 11/14/2011 07:57 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 18:18 +0100, Honza Horak wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> GNU database indexing library (gdbm) has changed its license to GPLv3+.
>>>
>>> A quick scan says this affects:
>> [...]
>>> ypserv (GPLv2)
>>
>> This one looks like an incompatibility.
> 
> Without going into details (in that I haven't read the source or the
> licenses in detail, just the GPL compatibility matrix) those are _all_
> likely incompatibilities.

A lot of GPLv2+ and GPL+ software as well as things under other licenses
in Fedora link to GPLv3+ libraries and I believe that's not considered a
problem as long as the former licenses are "upgradable" to GPLv3+ (which
GPLv2 is not).  For an example, see what links with readline:

repoquery --repoid=rawhide --qf="%{NAME}: %{LICENSE}" \
    --whatrequires --exactdeps "libreadline*.so*"

(Yep, there are some potential problem cases in that list as well, at
least the GPLv2 ones.)
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux