On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 7:59 PM, Adam Jackson <ajax@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 20:46 +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote: >> On 11/14/2011 07:57 PM, Adam Jackson wrote: >> > On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 18:18 +0100, Honza Horak wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> GNU database indexing library (gdbm) has changed its license to GPLv3+. >> > >> > A quick scan says this affects: >> [...] >> > ypserv (GPLv2) >> >> This one looks like an incompatibility. > > Without going into details (in that I haven't read the source or the > licenses in detail, just the GPL compatibility matrix) those are _all_ > likely incompatibilities. Also without reading the source, just the license tags, all of those "Lessers" and "pluses" make most of them compatible. Even Perl's "unholy" license (really (GPL+ or Artistic) and (GPLv2+ or Artistic) and Copyright Only and MIT and Public Domain and UCD) as a whole basically boils down to GPLv2+ which is okay (and in reality, it's only the (GPL+ or Artistic) bits that link with gdbm). The only other incompatibility seems to be ruby-libs with (Ruby or GPLv2). -- Iain. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
