On Nov 10, 2011, at 10:23 AM, Josh Stone wrote: > On 11/10/2011 10:15 AM, Jesse Keating wrote: >> On Nov 10, 2011, at 1:52 AM, Fabian Deutsch wrote: >>> >>> Someone might correct me, but rebasing introduces problems for >>> co-maintainers, if upstream (maintainer) decides to rebase some >>> branch. >>> >>> See http://man.he.net/man1/git-rebase >> >> Our repo setup does not allow non-fastforward changes, so there is no >> way to have a rebase action create problems for other maintainers. > > I suppose you mean no "git push -f", but do you also prevent deleting > branches? Otherwise you can manually force by deleting and pushing > anew. Of course, if you're doing that, you'd be better be very aware > that you're playing with fire... I don't believe you can delete a branch remotely, I think releng has to do it on the server. Yes, you could still ask releng to delete a branch, then you could re-create it with the same name and have the same net effect, however we don't let developers create (nor would we delete) the top level Fedora/EPEL branches. It'd be some other topic branch that would fall victim. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel