-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 11/08/2011 02:35 AM, Matej Cepl wrote: > Dne 7.11.2011 22:12, Matthew Garrett napsal(a): >> Having some public discussion of a potentially contentious >> feature is a great way to help fesco make decisions. I'm >> personally in favour of that happening on a mailing list rather >> than in the discussion page on a wiki - it's a lot easier to >> follow detailed conversation that way. > > Sure, I am not against discussion here, but my experience (and some > literature[1]) tells me that discussion have better tendency to > succeed when they are around some exact proposal (which is not > written in stone and the author must be flexible to accept > criticism of course). > > Best, > > Matěj </end-of-this-subthread> --------------- References: [1] > Roger Fisher, William L. Ury, Bruce Patton: Getting to Yes: > Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In; http://is.gd/LWZTfK > Well I threw one together. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ServicesPrivateTmp If I propose 3 features for Fedora 17, do I win a prize? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SELinuxDenyPtrace https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Securecontainers -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk65SKYACgkQrlYvE4MpobOVRgCeNcXpFZAbguRy0TwxTxg8OwlD SY0AoJeJqD9i2OGYG+xzENQfa7bcdshQ =j8WE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
