On Sat, Nov 05, 2011 at 05:29:38PM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 08:16:57 -0700, > Robyn Bergeron <rbergero@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Full information about the elections, including the elections schedule, > > and links to where one may nominate, can be seen here: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Elections > > This misses an important link. FESCO has their policy for elections at: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FESCo_election_policy > > One of the listed requirements is that nominees be members of the packager > group. We currently have a FESCO nominee who participates in QA who > does not qualify for FESCO if the information on that page is still > accurate. This should probably get clarified before the election gets > started. > > I think FESCO dates back before there was a formal QA group and it may make > sense to modify the requirements for FESCO members in light of changes > over the last 3 years. > This has come up before in recent-ish-ly (My memory seems to think about two election cycles ago so ~1 year. But I'm getting old and time may be passing me by faster than I think :-). At that time it was still thought that packager group made sense for people serving on FESCo. I don't remember any new information that differed from the discussion waaaay back in time when FESCo opened up the electorate to groups outside of packager but kept packager as a requirement for nominees. Note that this is just history; the people who make up FESCo these days may take the same arguments and apply a different weight to them than the people who discussed and decided upon this in the past. -Toshio
Attachment:
pgpIQtm9axEWH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
