On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Ian Malone <ibmalone@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 4 November 2011 13:21, seth vidal <skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Fri, 4 Nov 2011 10:25:54 +0000 (UTC) >> Bojan Smojver <bojan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> Adam Williamson <awilliam <at> redhat.com> writes: >>> >>> > > Yeah, I got that bit. But I'm sure all you folks are in the know, >>> > > so I asked. >>> > >>> > No more than anyone - there really is no cabal ;) All I know is >>> > what the GNOME / desktop team have said in public, but what they've >>> > said seems to point in a Shell-y direction, to me. >>> >>> I meant, on average, a guy working for Red Hat would know a whole lot >>> more about Gnome than myself, who's got zero knowledge. >>> >>> Anyhow, it's not the shell per se that's the problem. It's the >>> overview mode - so bloody annoying with its constant expose in/out >>> animations, lack of desktop visibility etc. I know - it looks great >>> on YouTube. Not so great when you have use it for work all day. >>> >>> Ah, never mind - just whinging... >>> >> > >> Install xfce. You'll be happy w/that. >> > > This is essentially giving up. It's frustrating to be stuck on > overview mode on a four core machine while gnome-shell is doing > /something/ but you don't know what. If it worked fluidly it would be > okay. Actually, the responsiveness issue isn't limited just to > overview, but that's where it's most annoying because it completely > cuts you off. (And ten seconds to get the applications list, really?) That's what people call "bugs" please file them (upstream) so that we can fix them. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
