On Fri, 4 Nov 2011 14:10:57 +0000 Ian Malone <ibmalone@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 4 November 2011 13:21, seth vidal <skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > On Fri, 4 Nov 2011 10:25:54 +0000 (UTC) > > Bojan Smojver <bojan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> Adam Williamson <awilliam <at> redhat.com> writes: > >> > >> > > Yeah, I got that bit. But I'm sure all you folks are in the > >> > > know, so I asked. > >> > > >> > No more than anyone - there really is no cabal ;) All I know is > >> > what the GNOME / desktop team have said in public, but what > >> > they've said seems to point in a Shell-y direction, to me. > >> > >> I meant, on average, a guy working for Red Hat would know a whole > >> lot more about Gnome than myself, who's got zero knowledge. > >> > >> Anyhow, it's not the shell per se that's the problem. It's the > >> overview mode - so bloody annoying with its constant expose in/out > >> animations, lack of desktop visibility etc. I know - it looks great > >> on YouTube. Not so great when you have use it for work all day. > >> > >> Ah, never mind - just whinging... > >> > > > > > Install xfce. You'll be happy w/that. > > > > This is essentially giving up. It's frustrating to be stuck on > overview mode on a four core machine while gnome-shell is doing > /something/ but you don't know what. If it worked fluidly it would be > okay. Actually, the responsiveness issue isn't limited just to > overview, but that's where it's most annoying because it completely > cuts you off. (And ten seconds to get the applications list, really?) > It's not giving up. It's moving on to something which does what you want. There's no malice here - just sense. -sv -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
