On Mon, 2011-10-31 at 09:01 -0400, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > Up to now the glusterfs and hekafs versions and releases have been the > same for f16 and rawhide, i.e.: glusterfs-3.2.4-1.x86_64.fc16.rpm, > glusterfs-3.2.4-1.x86_64.fc17.rpm, hekafs-0.7-16.x86_64.fc16.rpm, and > hekafs-0.7-16.x86_64.fc17.rpm. > > I did that because the source, thus far, is exactly the same for both > f16 and rawhide. In f16 and rawhide both glusterfs and hekafs used > sysv init.d scripts. > > Now for rawhide I'm going to switch to systemd. I know I can't switch > to systemd for f16, so the question is, what scheme should I used for > the release numbering? Honestly, I wouldn't fuss about keeping release numbers in sync - as soon as someone does the first Fedora 17 mass rebuild, they'll be out of sync anyway. Cheers, Mark. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
