Re: Rethinking proventester and critpath

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/01/2011 01:59 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> So, assuming I'm not grossly misanalysing the data, it seems that we
> could drop the proventester requirement from critical path updates with
> a negligable change in the quality of the updates. Thoughts?

Agreed flag it as tried and tested stats dont lie...

JBG
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux