Re: Bug in javac ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Christoph Höger <christoph.hoeger@xxxxxxxxxxxx> [2011-10-31 11:37]:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I am really unsure here, if this is a javac bug, or an eclipse glitch
> or something plain strange. Consider the following interfaces:
> 
> public interface A {
>     A foo();
> }
> 
> public interface B {
>     B foo();
> }
> 
> public interface C extends A, B {
>     @Override
>     C foo();
> }
> 
> Eclipse _does_ compile those interfaces. If you comment out C foo(),
> it (rightfully IMO) complains.
> javac does _not_ compile those interfaces and (IMO erroneously)
> complains about incompatible super interfaces.
> 
> Any ideas who is wrong?
>

It looks like a known bug in the 6 compiler related to interface
inheritance and covariant return types. I think this is the commit
that fixed it in 7:

http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/langtools/rev/4a3b9801f7a0
 
If you have code that resembles the above and would like to see the fix
backported to 6, please feel free to open a bug.

Cheers,
Deepak
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux