On Fri, 28.10.11 14:26, Zing (zing@xxxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 11:47:04 +0200, Harald Hoyer wrote: > > > Read the rpm snippet on the feature page, please. > > I just briefly browsed the feature page and the requirement on initramfs > piqued me. Maybe I'm wrong, but usrmove would then make fedora systems > from now on specifically require the use of an initramfs? Not too happy > with the loss of flexibility here if that's true. We do not support initrd-less boots at all right now on Fedora. It breaks SELinux and Plymouth and a couple of other things. [ I am actually quite interested to make things work without initrd again, and in F16 the SELinux situation at least has been fixed, with only Plymouth leaving, but this has never been an official release goal, just something I worked on with system. ] So, given that we currently don't support initrd-less boots at all I think the /usr move changes nothing in this regard for now. On top of that note that /usr split off and not mounted in initrd has been broken since ages, so there isn't any news in it anyway. http://freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/separate-usr-is-broken Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
