On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 09:18:55 -0600 Jerry James wrote: > The first two should be dead easy. From Fedora's point of view, > they're just data packages; no libraries or binaries are involved. > The third one is a bit complex. I had to tweak a lot of pathnames to > match existing Fedora practice, as well as do some violence to the > Makefiles to eliminate unused direct shared library dependencies and > undefined non-weak symbols. So please swap me for 2 easy and one hard > review of your own. :-) Do you consider this an easy or a hard one: ;) espresso - Extensible Simulation Package for Research on Soft matter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=740846 I'll try to have a look at your hard one, but I have no ocalm experience yet. So maybe I'll just review your first one - we'll see ;) Tom -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
