Re: Another glibc change that nearly got pushed into F16

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Matthias Clasen <mclasen@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Wed, 2011-10-26 at 16:12 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 10:06:31AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> /usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gmacros.h:32:2: error: #error "Only <glib.h> can be included directly."

>> You are confusing glibc with glib here, the above very much looks like
>> a glib bug, nothing to do with glibc.

I stand corrected ... too early in the morning ...

> Its not a bug, just a change. Including individual glib headers has been
> discouraged for a long time. In GLib 2.31, it has been outlawed.

Hmm.  You'd better start filing FTBFS reports against your dependent
packages, then, so they don't get blindsided by this.

			regards, tom lane
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux