Re: New bodhi bugfix release in production

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 26/10/11 12:45, Kevin Kofler wrote:

> Maybe we could do what some sites like kde-apps.org do and default to URLs
> which include BOTH the ID and the packagename-version list, but have Bodhi
> only actually use the ID and ignore the packagename-version entirely.
>
> See e.g.:
> http://kde-apps.org/content/show.php/Apper?content=84745
> http://kde-apps.org/content/show.php/KPackageKit?content=84745
> http://kde-apps.org/content/show.php/Pink_Pony?content=84745
> http://kde-apps.org/content/show.php?content=84745
> (The first link is what the site produces by default, the second is what it
> used to produce before the package got renamed, the third is to prove you
> can write in anything and it will be ignored and the fourth is the
> equivalent of Bodhi's current ID-based URLs, which also works.)
> But I'd put the ID first so it's easier to rip off the ignored stuff from
> the link if a short URL is needed.

Many CMS systems and the like work in that way. It's also what things 
like stackoverflow do, for example:

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7901782/war-does-not-start-on-tomcat5-on-redhat-enterprise-server

where only the question number really matters - you can change the text 
which follows to anything.

Tom

-- 
Tom Hughes (tom@xxxxxxxxxx)
http://compton.nu/
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux