On Mon, 2011-10-24 at 15:46 -0400, Alex Lancaster wrote: > > My sentiments exactly. Better not to keep known broken packages > > around; it's only going to cause grief for users if they find out they > > can't even install the package. > > > > Once it's fixed upstream to not rely on libgnomeuimm, it can easily be > > added back to Fedora. > > > > Alex, could you please follow the End of Life procedure to get it > > removed from F16+? > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/PackageEndOfLife > > Done: retired package in packagedb, removed files in git and filed > rel-eng bug: > > https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4962 > > (Will check comps now, to make sure it's removed from there too, > if present). > > Alex Hi, Just wondering if we have another reference tool in the repos? Anyone? -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur: "FranciscoD" http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha http://dodoincfedora.wordpress.com/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
