On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 07:52:04PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Sat, 08.10.11 16:01, Richard Shaw (hobbes1069@xxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > What Tomasz said, and if that doesn't help use bootchart and upload > > > the chart somewhere so I can see what's going on. Thanks, > > > > Here's my bootchart link before making any modifications: > > > > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/34775202/boot.png > > Umpf. tmpfiles being that slow looks very weird. Only reasonably > explanation I could have for that is that you have a really deep > directory tree in /tmp/ or /var/tmp. What's going on there? tmpfiles being slow is nothing new, actually. Take a look at this: http://pipebreaker.pl/dump/2011-10_bootchart.png It's my test machine with btrfs / on old disk (20GB IDE Maxtor). tmpfiles take 30s to run, without any special configuration. Oh, and its F15 system. Is it worth putting few printf() inside systemd-tmpfiles to see where's the time spent? -- Tomasz Torcz "God, root, what's the difference?" xmpp: zdzichubg@xxxxxxxxx "God is more forgiving." -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
