On Sat, 2011-10-22 at 00:55 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 10/22/2011 12:44 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Fri, 2011-10-21 at 22:06 +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote: > >> On 10/21/2011 07:51 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > >> > >>> If it's being stripped there's probably a good *reason* for it to be > >>> stripped > >> > >> I'd say its much more likely that they're just trying to save some space > >> on end user systems where stuff is built from source by users and the > >> users are too lazy to strip things him/herself if they happen to want > >> that. In my experience, upstreams are receptive to patches that make > >> the stripping behavior optional, for example "STRIP = strip" and > >> invoking "$(STRIP)" in Makefile which can then be overridden for example > >> with "make STRIP=/bin/true ...". > > > > It's being stripped in the spec, not the upstream source. > > where? take a glance at the spec file > > http://pjp.dgplug.org/tools/pdfcrack.spec ah, sorry, I misread josh's email - he was looking at the koji log, not the spec file. apologies. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
