Re: Building cpufreq modules into F16 kernel is it right or wrong?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2011/10/18  <alekcejk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Changing governor can't help me, I need frequency scaling completely disabled.
> cpupower.service starts cpupower which can't set frequency
> which I set in BIOS (slightly overclocked).
> This is cpufreq modules problem because frequency which
> I set is not in range which can be detected by
> cpufreq modules and cpupower.
>
> I have no such problems only when cpufreq modules not loaded.
> Loading module immediately sets wrong frequency in /proc/cpuinfo
> while real frequency shown by 'cpupower monitor' is equal
> to what I set in BIOS.
> That's why forcing cpufreq module loading by building them
> into kernel is unacceptable for me.
>
> Loading modules by starting service was more flexible.
>
> --
> Alexey Kurov <nucleo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>

I understand.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=713572 (you already posted there)

Let's hope the CPU modaliases stuff get done some day.

Marcos
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux