Adam Williamson wrote: > The other problem with screenshot validation is that it's inherently > unsuited to some tests that are important to Fedora and that we have > more-or-less working *right now* in AutoQA - things like depcheck and > repoclosure - because all it can really tell you is 'does this results > screen look like a known pass case' Well, the test could: 1. bring up a known terminal emulator, 2. type this into it: su -c "yum -y install packagename >/dev/null 2>/dev/null; echo $?" 3. have a PASS screenshot where the terminal emulator displays 0 and a FAIL screenshot where the terminal emulator displays 1. (But of course that takes a lot more work to set up than just checking the dependencies directly.) > - it's inherently pass/fail based, which is no use if the output you want > is "these five dependencies are broken". And this is of course the drawback of such an approach. Kevin Kofler -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel