On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 17:18:10 -0400 Bill Nottingham wrote: > Rahul Sundaram (metherid@xxxxxxxxx) said: > > On 10/10/2011 08:52 PM, Thomas Spura wrote: > > > > > So there doesn't need to be more co-maintainers (which is welcomed > > > anyway), but it would help to get such updates pushed to stable > > > directly like it was without the forced period in updates-testing > > > or a heads up before doing such an update. > > > > I think the heads up should be automated via the build system. > > If the required updates are due to version checks in the extensions, > it might be possible to have RPM have a dependency generator that > checks these and outputs the appropriate Requires/Conflicts lines, > such that this could be easily caught by AutoQA. Implemented and proposed as a subpackage to mozilla-filesystem at: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745038 Any extension, which BR: mozilla-build then has the correct requires, if it's installed correctly. "Correctly" means here, without symlinks, like I currently do in noscript and other extensions are doing it too right now. I'd propose to finally have mozilla-noscript, which pulls all subpackages, e.g. firefox-noscript and seahorse-noscript etc, and only those subpackages require firefox OR seahorse. Comments? -Tom -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
