On 10/08/2011 04:44 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > if there would be much more care by introducing new features/replacements > my understanding for the fear of update thmen after that would be much higher > > as long fedora is shooting out new features without any care if they are > really ready fdora should also update them - systemd as best example > > and no - this is not flaming - this is simply the wish if i get new > software which is not really ready but seems good anough for a GA-release > i expect updates of this software are more than good enough to be push ASAP This argument makes some sense (if a bit overblown) - we do seem more concerned about not updating than not releasing in the first place - e.g. while its true we delayed systemd - the general noise level suggests it was still not solid enough ... once its released 'core' components get less love coz making changes is bad ... This seems a bit odd ... we're cutting edge - but if the cut smells then its too bad ... I still strongly advocate for a rolling release - where single large core changes can be serialized if need be into the testing repo for as long as it takes to stabilize them (or pulled back out as a unit) - and smaller improvements and bug fixes can continue unimpeded ... now we could be truly leading edge. gene/ -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
