Jesse Keating wrote: > On Oct 7, 2011, at 8:21 AM, Till Maas wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 07:53:25AM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: >> >>> Might have gone quicker if you pull via git:// and then only push >>> via ssh:// reducing your ssh handshakes by half. >> >> How do you ensure the integrity of the git repo if it is pulled via >> git://? As far as I can see doing this automatically is an invitation to >> perform man-in-the-middle attacks. [...] > Sure that's a risk. It'd take a fairly sophisticated attach to take > advantage of it, but yes, it's a risk. Strikes me as easier to just > fake your way into the packager group and upload your bad-bits that > way. Everything is a balance between risk and performance. Quite true. For anyone that wanted a bit of both, you could pull via git and then verify the hash of the branches before you you used them. It's quick to use git ls-remote to get that information over ssh, for one branch, or just heads, or whatever. [tmz@panaeolus git (master)]$ git ls-remote ssh://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/git master f8faec03bd41627fb60e26004b1727d30fabe94a refs/heads/master [tmz@panaeolus git (master)]$ git for-each-ref refs/remotes/origin/master f8faec03bd41627fb60e26004b1727d30fabe94a commit refs/remotes/origin/master Or just using cat: [tmz@panaeolus git (master)]$ cat .git/refs/remotes/origin/master f8faec03bd41627fb60e26004b1727d30fabe94a -- Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Religion. A daughter of Hope and Fear, explaining to Ignorance the nature of the Unknowable. -- Ambrose Bierce, The Enlarged Devil's Dictionary, 1906
Attachment:
pgpZ_VT1ccI0Q.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel