Re: release number when upstream *only* has git hashes?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/05/2011 04:35 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 06:53:50AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>> On 10/04/2011 09:01 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>>
>>>   Now do we want to put the git hash into the version
>>> field too?
>> Yes, because "git checkouts by date" are not sufficiently reliable to
>> provide deterministic checkouts from git.
>>
> I hope you don't really mean this.
Certainly not -  "version <-> release" mixup on my part :() - Sorry.

> git hashes belong in the Release field;
> not in the version field.

I was advocating to mandate git hashes as part of the "release"-string, 
because "checkouts by date" do not work well with git.

Ralf

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux