On Fri, 2011-09-23 at 16:31 -0400, Doug Ledford wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > > The setup inside Red Hat cannot be (directly) copied outside at this > > time. Instead the autoQA project was started to re-create it as an > > open source project. That's where effort should continue. > > Am I right in saying that AutoQA is basically mired in the muck and going nowhere at the moment? "at the moment", yes, but that's with a very narrow scope of "at the moment" - i.e. for the last few weeks. I don't want Kamil's email to give the impression that AutoQA has been going nowhere for months, because that certainly isn't the case. Work has slowed down in the last few weeks because Fedora 16 Beta testing was extremely problematic and sucked up most of the AutoQA manpower, and QA is anyway undermanned (from a Red Hat paid staff viewpoint) ATM. It should speed up again to a lesser degree now, and to a greater degree when Final is done and we have a couple more bodies in place. I think adding some more rpmdiff-type tests to current AutoQA wouldn't actually be a huge stretch, but I'd bow to Tim or Kamil on the detail front there. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
