On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 16:09 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Matthias Clasen <mclasen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 15:47 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > > >> > >> There's nothing to do apart from waiting for enough complains to pile up the > >> people in charge get past their reality denial phase. > >> </rant> > > > > This thread could have let to something constructive... but not so much > > anymore now, I guess. Good going, getting down to the rant level in less > > than 10 mails :-( > > There's no reason it can't be recovered, Matthias can you provide an > explanation of the changes and the rationale behind them? They're documented in the code,, which has a link to the bug. We basically can't trust the DPI X.org gives us. Which is something 2 people who have been working on GTK+ for > 10 years mention on the bug, and I've double/triple checked with X hackers. I'm not sure how we can make DPI magically be correct in gazillions of broken displays' EDID. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
