Hi, On 10/01/2011 11:13 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Hans de Goede<hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> Please note that I'm not claiming that the critpath process is broken >> in general. But it does not work for certain components. To be specific >> it does not work for Xorg drivers for non common hardware. >> >> This morning bodhi send me 3 mails with the following subjects: >> [Fedora Update] [CRITPATH] [old_testing_critpath] xorg-x11-drv-qxl-0.0.21-3.fc14 >> [Fedora Update] [CRITPATH] [old_testing_critpath] xorg-x11-drv-qxl-0.0.21-5.fc15 >> [Fedora Update] [CRITPATH] [old_testing_critpath] xorg-x11-drv-qxl-0.0.21-5.fc16 >> >> Of which the first update has been in updates-testing since 2011-04-23 !!! >> >> I know that Adam Williamson uses spice enabled vm's and thus the qxl driver >> for various QA tasks. I've asked him repeatedly to look at these, but all >> to no avail. Note I'm not blaming Adam for this, we all need to prioritize >> our time, so I completely understand that he has not gotten around to >> looking at these. I'm merely trying to documents my efforts to make the >> critpath procedure work for the qxl driver. >> >> So there you have it, I hope that an update being stuck in updates-testing for >> 4+ months clearly show that some parts of the critpath process need to be re-thought. > > There is a ticket open with fesco to improve the critpath process. You > can see the proposed changes on the link below. > > https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/667 Thanks for the link I've added my 2 cents to the ticket. Regards, Hans -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
