> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 02:02:15PM -0400, David Airlie wrote: > > > you run rpm -q grub in the guest and on the host, if they are the > > same nvr, > > then they are the same package, where's the rocket science here. > > No, that's not good enough. You need to know the version installed on > the system, not the packaged version. Upgrading the package doesn't > cause grub-install to be rerun. > > > > There is no rational reason to have grub and grub2 installed on > > > the > > > same > > > system at once, and having them both there increases the > > > complexity > > > of > > > the system. > > > > you can install KDE and GNOME and you are worrying about grub and > > grub2? > > They don't both attempt to sit in the same few bytes. Nicely editing out of the other use-case I supplied. grub and grub2 *packages* don't install into the same few bytes. I thought you were good at backing up arguments with technical reasons, not strawmen. The argument is "should it be possible to install grub1 and grub2 *packages* on the same system?" The strawman is if you install grub1 and grub2 bootloaders into the MBR on the same system they will conflict. I totally agree with your strawman, but you still haven't provided any technical reasons why the argument is wrong. Above all people Matthew I thought you were aware of how strawmen work and would be against their use. Dave. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
