2011/9/20 Christoph Wickert <christoph.wickert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > Am Dienstag, den 20.09.2011, 16:06 +0200 schrieb Nicolas Chauvet: >> I'm the maintainer of opencv here. >> >> quick answear: I have no right to submit a bodhi update for packages I >> do not own. Given that I'm no in the provenpackager group. >> So as I cannot expect every single maintainers to respond in time, the >> consequence is that I depend on a provenpackager to do the whole task >> of "administrative rebuilt of dependent packages". >> Unfortunately it became a way more complicated task with the collapse >> of two bodhi tickets and others unexpected behaviour. > > IHMO the proper way to deal with this is: > 1. Mail fedora-devel and owners of dependent packages (at least) > one week in advance. This is a requirement and written down in > our wiki [1]. repoquery and the foo-owner aliases should help > here. > 2. Ask maintainers if they are ok with the update and willing/able > to do a rebuild in time. Offer to rebuild packages if people are > not able to do it. Request the necessary commit access in > packagedb. > 3. Once you have sufficient feedback, update opencv. > 4. Submit a buildroot overwrite for opencv but do not push it to > stable or testing. > 5. Mail owners again and tell them they can now rebuild their > packages > 6. Wait for feedback before you create an update. If you have > commit access, you can include dependent packages in the update. > Proven packager will not work. > 7. Mail owners again when you push the update from one tag to > another. You missed the point, this process was started 3 weeks away from now with the help of rdieter since then. The problem is about this legitimate update that was truncated by some bodhi ACL weirdness I didn't expected. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-12320 In others words, I've pushed this ticket to stable but only packages I actually own was pushed to dist-16, others packages in this tickets went back to limbo. This unexpected behavior evidently broke dependencies. While submitting this update to stable I was even informed that packages I didn't own was tagged as dist-16. This didn't take into. Nicolas (kwizart) -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel