On 09/17/2011 05:58 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > > On 09/17/2011 07:53 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote: >> The near-flamefest on this thread over whose depsolver is the best is >> largely besides the point: in a perfect world there would be just one >> Grand Unified Depsolver (library) that everything including rpm itself >> would use. And in order for rpm to be able to use it, it'd have to be >> implemented in C. Whether its *in* rpm or something external (such as >> libsatsolver) is a different question entirely. Now there's a nice >> little pet-project for somebody > > Ah I was hoping to come to this point. You are willing to merge a > depsolver directly in RPM? With if's and but's ... yes. Otherwise there wouldn't have been much point in bringing this up in the first place. > If so, have you looked at libsolv? Not in any depth (yet), but that'd be the obvious starting point. Based on very cursory first looks, it appears spot-on in terms of abstraction & layering. - Panu - -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
