On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 19:42 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: > On 16 September 2011 18:43, seth vidal <skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > having different tools is not acceptable. Especially when one of them is > > not even remotely covering the use cases of our actual users. > > Installing 205 new i686 packages when updating the system is not acceptable. I agree with that. The cases where that occurs are all tied up in insufficiently specified requirements. > > I think I'm going to suggest to fesco that all non-yum depsolvers be > > removed from the distribution. It just creates more work than it does > > value. > > Ha! That's really funny, and it's just made my evening. While you're > asking fesco, can you also ask them to remove KDE and XFCE as well > please. I've made the proposal for non-yum-based package managers to be removed from fedora. Your attitude is quite unfortunate. I'd hope you'd want to work with others to make fedora better but you don't. There's a packaging team you should work with and for if you intend to continue working on package managers. -sv -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
