On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 10:10 -0500, W. Michael Petullo wrote: > >> There are known bugs in FC15/FC16 that have been filled some time ago that > >> folks will sadly run into: 728775, 658387 and 668063 > >> > >> Fortunatly the bugs have patches attached and the files to be modified are shell scripts. > > > Yep, links here: > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728775 > > The Fedora update system reports this is fixed in grub2-1.99-6.fc16. > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658387 > > Peter Jones submitted a new grubby package yesterday. This seems to fix > bug #658387 (i.e., new-kernel-pkg creates a Dom0-style grub.cfg entry > if /etc/sysconfig/kernel contains "HYPERVISOR=/boot/xen.gz"). > > I have not yet tested this on Fedora 16. However, I did test on Fedora > 15. In this case, bug #668063 is still in effect. That is, grubby creates > most of a GRUB record, but the "module initramfs-..." entry is missing. > > Has anyone yet tested this new grubby package on Fedora 16 yet? Does > using GRUB 2 makes #668063 irrelevant? > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668063 > > I just added some more description to this bug. So, there's a meta-point here: we currently 'require' Beta releases to boot as guests on Xen hosts: "The release must boot successfully as a virtual guest in a situation where the virtual host is running a supported Xen implementation" I really don't have much knowledge of Xen and haven't followed this discussion closely, but do any currently-known bugs prevent this? If so, please flag them up so they can be considered as Beta blockers...thanks! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
