On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 17:47 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote: > 2011/9/14 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" <johannbg@xxxxxxxxx>: > > On 09/14/2011 02:22 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > >> Is systemd boot actually any faster? There seems to be no > >> noticable difference in boot times for me over whatever we > >> were using in F14. ie. both methods still takes ages, far > >> longer than should be necessary. > > > > We arent optimising the default desktop install live or otherwise for an > > actual desktop install. It's currently aimed at "Generic" or "Corporate > > " installs. ... > > Anything above 4 seconds on ssd's would I consider unacceptable ( I > > think Lennart and Kay are booting around s1><4s second on those ) > > I use ssd. > > Startup finished in 1819ms (kernel) + 2495ms (initrd) + 8013ms > (userspace) = 12328ms > > The slowest part is > 3633ms mysqld.service > 2288ms postgresql.service > old versions that are better than native services. I think Johann's 1-4s scenario assumes a basic desktop configuration and a tweaked startup config aimed at such a system. Such a system would not have two big database engines starting up, but zero. =) The lowest I've seen on my system, which is quick and has a third-gen SSD in it, is 8s, but I haven't made any tweaks to startup config at all. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
