On 09/14/2011 11:28 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Don't confuse we with facts! I've already made up my mind! ;-)=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Miloslav_Trma=E8?= <mitr@xxxxxxxx> writes:2011/9/14 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" <johannbg@xxxxxxxxx>:An simple test to measure this reliably is to strip down the legacy sysv init script to the start up command only and have a strip down unit file to the startup command only. Then time the startup of either.Why? The current numbers show that the service file is _slower_ even when the old init script is supposedly doing much more work in shell. If anything, stripping the unessential parts should make the service file _even slower_ in relative terms.Yes. The unit file is already stripped down: it does nothing except "pg_ctl start". The init script had accumulated a whole lot of perhaps-unnecessary sanity-checking, which frankly I'd rather have kept but the systemd mantra seems to be "no shell scripting" so I didn't. Michal's numbers look pretty damning, and I find it remarkable that the systemd advocates seem to have managed not to read them, let alone admit that they suggest something's seriously wrong. regards, tom lane --
Stephen Clark NetWolves Sr. Software Engineer III Phone: 813-579-3200 Fax: 813-882-0209 Email: steve.clark@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.netwolves.com |
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
