On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 09:43:27 +0100, Frank Murphy <frankly3d@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 11/09/11 09:33, Jim Meyering wrote: > > darrell pfeifer wrote: > >> Fails for me too, with the same error. > > > > Thanks for confirming that. > > > > I don't mean to be rude or inflammatory, but do have to wonder how such > > a fundamentally-broken package was released -- even to rawhide. In the > > fedora openssh release process, isn't there some sort of sanity check > > that would catch this before inflicting it on all rawhide users? > > Is not rawhide "the sanity check", even if used productively by many? I would have expected this to have been caught before subjecting rawhide users to it. And I would have expected after having made it to rawhide, it would have been fixed in a day (even if it was just removing the bad builds). -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
