Frank Murphy wrote: > On 11/09/11 09:33, Jim Meyering wrote: >> darrell pfeifer wrote: >>> Fails for me too, with the same error. >> >> Thanks for confirming that. >> >> I don't mean to be rude or inflammatory, but do have to wonder how such >> a fundamentally-broken package was released -- even to rawhide. In the >> fedora openssh release process, isn't there some sort of sanity check >> that would catch this before inflicting it on all rawhide users? > > Is not rawhide "the sanity check", even if used productively by many? I was thinking of something more like "make check" (that would run a test suite), or "maintainer gives it a spin before releasing". But maybe something about the maintainer's set-up was different enough that those tests would all pass. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
