Re: Broken dependencies: pino

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 16:52 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 09/08/2011 04:43 PM, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> > Given that several changes are needed, it's probably best for one of
> > the Pino maintainers to make the update (I'd not feel comfortable
> > doing anything more than just adjusting for the libgee changes)
> 
> Upstream is struck in development stage for a long time after the
> rewrite started and hasn't been responsive to any bug reports filed.  I
> am inclined to just orphan it

I would second this. I've got a number of critical bugs still open in
Bugzilla about pino; these have been open since before F15 released IIRC
and it has been totally unusable (for anyone, as far as I can tell)
since then.

It's a shame because I was a big user of it (obviously), but I've had to
go back using twitter/identi.ca directly; it simply doesn't work.

Cheers

Alex.


--
This message was scanned by Better Hosted and is believed to be clean.
http://www.betterhosted.com

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux