2011/9/4 Christian Krause <chkr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > Hi David, > > On 08/31/2011 09:37 AM, Woodhouse, David wrote: >> On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 02:42 +0200, Christian Krause wrote: > >>> I have looked at the list of open bugs for vpnc and it looks like that >>> there are a couple of packaging issues, some problems with the >>> vpnc-script and some other issues which may require some upstream >>> help. >> >> Are there any problems with vpnc-script that *aren't* fixed by simply >> updating to the one in >> http://git.infradead.org/users/dwmw2/vpnc-scripts.git ? > > I have looked at the git repository and I'm unsure about one change: > > The commit: > http://git.infradead.org/users/dwmw2/vpnc-scripts.git/commitdiff/ea98b094e8f75fcd696db81bc6c5160dc67b4e4f > > > seems to fix https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693235 > (negative MTU) in case "ip route ... " does not report the mtu. > > However, at least on my systems, "ip route ..." does never return the > mtu in its output and so the script will always use the hard-coded > fallback value 1412 as MTU. > > The proposed patch attached to the bug report ( > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=515615 ) uses a different > approach: > It extracts the actual interface via "ip route" and retrieves the MTU > via "ip link show $interface". > > What do you think about this patch? What does upstream think about the patch? > > > Best regards, > Christian > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
