Re: Memory requirements (was: Re: Fedora 16 Alpha i386 does not install in VMWare)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2011-08-30 at 21:11 -0700, Jeremiah Summers wrote:

> I would say thank you but the tone I'm getting in the email seems
> rather reluctant to try and be as memory efficient as possible, a
> little bit like "we just did it to stop your whining". I'm sure that's
> not the tone you mean and even if so I'm sure you're not talking "for"
> the anaconda team. 

Yes, both of those are true. I just get a bit irked that the issue keeps
getting raised as if it's some stunning new discovery and the anaconda
team has been hideously lax in not caring about it, because it's
well-known and they _do_ care about it. =)

> So regardless.. Thank You all who have beaten this
> thing to death and those who won't let it die until it's as efficient
> as possible with the hardware given.

seconded!
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux