On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Rahul Sundaram <metherid@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Otherwise, make > ddate a sub package and don't install it by default. Solved? As an upstream the willingness of distributions to strip out commands which I wanted to provide and don't offer a build option to disable via sub-packaging will simply encourage me to pack more functionality into single binaries that the distributions won't strip. So I think Fedora shouldn't be more willing to strip ddate than it would be willing to patch out ddate functionality if it were embedded in 'hwclock'. There is a reasonable argument that util-linux ought to go on a diet: Right now it appears to take up 6424k on disk. (Though, most of that is localizations— and several of the various NEWS/readme files it includes are bigger than ddate, as is its copy of the GPL. This silly thread has probably taken up more disk space than ddate, or it soon will) -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
