Re: NetworkManager, openswan and l2tp

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/26/2011 11:50 -0400, Dan Williams wrote:

On Fri, 2011-08-26 at 11:50 -0400, Avesh Agarwal wrote:
>> >  On 08/26/2011 05:09 AM, Eberhard Schruefer wrote:
>>> >  >  On 08/25/2011 13:57 -0500,  Dan Williams wrote:
>>> >  >
>>> >  >  On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 11:00 +0200, Eberhard Schruefer wrote:
>>>>>> >  >>>>     Hello,
>>>>>>> >  >>>>>     I need to connect to a site via l2tp/openswan. I can set up
>>>>> >  >>>  openswan and
>>>>>> >  >>>>     xl2tpd
>>>>>> >  >>>>     manually and this works fine. However, bringing up the connection
>>>>> >  >>>  is not
>>>>>> >  >>>>     very
>>>>>> >  >>>>     comfortable and it would be much nicer to be able to use the
>>>>>> >  >>>>     networkmanager-openswan
>>>>>> >  >>>>     plugin.
>>>>>> >  >>>>     Unfortunately, l2tp and other 'advanced settings' cannot be
>>>>> >  >>>  selected from
>>>>>> >  >>>>     networkmanager-connection-editor. A quick look at the source code of
>>>>>> >  >>>>     NetworkManager-openswan-1.7.0 shows that these options are
>>>>> >  >>>  programmed,
>>>>>> >  >>>>     but seem not to be available in Fedora 15.
>>>> >  >>  Which openswan sources are you looking at?
>>> >  >  I'm referring to the networkmanager-openswan plugin source written by
>>> >  >  Alexander Dorokhov
>>> >  >  (hosted on xelerance). It seems that everything necessary to be set
>>> >  >  through the UI is there and
>>> >  >  also the code for bringing up xl2tpd. However, it looks like that
>>> >  >  openswan itself has to be
>>> >  >  compiled with HAVE_STATSD. It would be great if we could all have that
>>> >  >  in FEDORA!
>> >  HAVE_STATSD is disabled by openswan upstream by default. If the option
>> >  is enabled upstream in a future release,it will be in Fedora too.
>>>>>> >  >>>>     Will these options eventually be set-able in Fedora?
>>>> >  >>  It's probable they will be but it might take some work.  AFAIK there
>>>> >  >>  isn't yet an L2TP VPN plugin for NM though I've heard of people working
>>>> >  >>  on one.
>>>> >  >>
>>>>>> >  >>>>     Would converting the glade file in NetworkManager-openswan-1.7.0 to
>>>>>> >  >>>>     gtkbuilder
>>>>>> >  >>>>     and a recompile of networkmanager-openswan suffice?
>>>> >  >>  As part of the NM 0.9 push we moved the existing NM-openvpn plugin to
>>>> >  >>  git.gnome.org and cleaned it up, including converting to GtkBuilder.
>>>> >  >>  But that alone wouldn't magically make L2TP work unless the right
>>>> >  >>  options were added to the UI.
>>> >  >  I think to vaguely remember that these options were available in very
>>> >  >  early releases of the openswan
>>> >  >  networkmanager plugin, but disappeared in later versions. What was
>>> >  >  reason for that?
>> >  The red hat implementation hosted at git.gnome.org never had L2TP
>> >  options, and so these option were never in Fedora.
> Would be cool if we could add it though...  TBH I'm not actually
> familiar with how the layering works with L2TP, since I thought it was
> more standalone like PPTP but just somehow better.  My lack of knowledge
> about L2TP could fill a barrel, simply because I haven't had time to
> investigate.  If others know more, by all means, help us out with
> patches.
>
> Dan

Is there any strong reason for not compiling the current openswan with 
HAVE_STATSD
and making all options available that offers networkmanager-openswan-1.7.0?

I think it would indeed be very cool!

Eberhard
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux