Hi,
I opened the pasted review request above because fuse-s3fs (hint: need sponsor :) wouldn't work in my machine.
When I went to the Google code page I saw it had been three years with no commit while it never left alpha status, that's why I submitted a new request for s3fs.
On Aug 23, 2011 4:47 AM, "Neil Horman" <nhorman@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 11:12:55AM +0300, Muayyad AlSadi wrote:
>> is this project still active ?
>>
> Yes, the project is still active.
>
>> if not then fedora should have rpm for the other s3fs project <
>> http://code.google.com/p/s3fs
>>
>> if so then the following lines in the code should be fixed
> Then please open a bug.
>
>>
>> #Set the env correctly
>> if self.AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID != None:
>> os.putenv("AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID",self.AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID)
>> if self.AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY != None:
>> os.putenv("AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY",
>> self.AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY)
>>
>> if (os.environ.get("AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID") == None):
>> print "Need to specify AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID"
>> if (os.environ.get("AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY") == None):
>> print "Need to specify AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY"
>>
>> as python docs says < http://docs.python.org/library/os.html#os.putenv
>>
>> When putenv() is supported, assignments to items in os.environ are
>> automatically translated into corresponding calls to putenv();
>> however, calls to putenv() don’t update os.environ, so it is actually
>> preferable to assign to items of os.environ.
>>
>> the code above set's env with putenv then read it with environ
>> the docs says just set it with environ and it will call putenv
>>
>> so it should be
>>
>> if self.AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID != None:
>> os.environ["AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID"]=self.AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID
>> if self.AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY != None:
>> os.environ["AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY"]=self.AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY
>> --
>> devel mailing list
>> devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 11:12:55AM +0300, Muayyad AlSadi wrote:
>> is this project still active ?
>>
> Yes, the project is still active.
>
>> if not then fedora should have rpm for the other s3fs project <
>> http://code.google.com/p/s3fs
>>
>> if so then the following lines in the code should be fixed
> Then please open a bug.
>
>>
>> #Set the env correctly
>> if self.AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID != None:
>> os.putenv("AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID",self.AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID)
>> if self.AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY != None:
>> os.putenv("AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY",
>> self.AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY)
>>
>> if (os.environ.get("AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID") == None):
>> print "Need to specify AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID"
>> if (os.environ.get("AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY") == None):
>> print "Need to specify AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY"
>>
>> as python docs says < http://docs.python.org/library/os.html#os.putenv
>>
>> When putenv() is supported, assignments to items in os.environ are
>> automatically translated into corresponding calls to putenv();
>> however, calls to putenv() don’t update os.environ, so it is actually
>> preferable to assign to items of os.environ.
>>
>> the code above set's env with putenv then read it with environ
>> the docs says just set it with environ and it will call putenv
>>
>> so it should be
>>
>> if self.AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID != None:
>> os.environ["AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID"]=self.AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID
>> if self.AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY != None:
>> os.environ["AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY"]=self.AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY
>> --
>> devel mailing list
>> devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
