Am 22.08.2011 02:56, schrieb Nathan Owe: > I am currently working on packaging c-icap I get the following error > using rpmlint: rpmlint > /var/lib/mock/fedora-15-x86_64/result/c-icap-0.1.6-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm > c-icap.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency zlib c-icap.x86_64: W: > devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/bin/c-icap-libicapapi-config > c-icap.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package > /usr/bin/c-icap-config [...] > Now the last two, well can the last two actually be development > files? I never thought a binary file would be considered a > development file. I am asking that since I wanted to make sure there > wasn't an error in the rpmlint's output. Hi Nathan, filenames that match ".*/bin/.+-config$" are regarded as build-config files (like libpng-config, freetype-config, etc.), and these kind of -config files should go into a devel package. However, in your case the rpmlint warnings seem to be false positive and can probably be ignored. The reviewer should have a look at them, though. Regards, Martin -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
